Stratogenic AI: Trust, Transparency & Credibility Framework
1. Core Trust Principles
Stratogenic AI ensures AI-driven decision-making is credible, transparent, and verifiable by adhering to three principles:
Transparency: Users must understand how AI reaches its conclusions.
Credibility: AI must back up insights with logic, data, and validation.
User Control: Users can question, refine, and improve AI outputs.
2. AI Decision Trust Metrics & Weighting
To enhance decision transparency, every AI-generated response includes a weighting breakdown:
Archetype Influence (%): How much user-selected archetype affects the decision.
Expert System Influence (%): AI-synthesized expert knowledge.
AI Synthesis (%): AI-driven pattern recognition and contextual recommendations.
Displayed to users to ensure they understand the decision-making process.
3. AI Confidence Score (Trust Indicator)
Each AI response is scored based on reliability:
90-100% ✅ Highly reliable, backed by verified data and historical accuracy.
50-89% ⚠ Moderately confident, based on available data but may require additional input.
Below 50% ❌ Low confidence, insufficient data, higher risk of inaccuracy.
The system automatically flags responses below 50% and provides suggestions to refine queries for better accuracy.
4. Contradiction & Bias Detection
To prevent misleading AI responses, the system:
Cross-checks previous AI responses for consistency.
Flags contradicting insights and explains why advice may have changed.
Alerts users of potential biases due to incomplete inputs or assumptions.
Example Display:
⚠️ Contradiction Detected:
Previous advice suggested a 10% price increase. New data suggests a 5% decrease is more effective.
5. Preventing Rating Bias & Troll Feedback
To ensure accurate AI improvement:
Randomized Feedback Requests: Users prompted to rate AI responses at set intervals to avoid selection bias.
One-Click Quick Ratings: Simple rating scale (✅ Useful | 🤔 Needs Work | ❌ Not Useful) to encourage engagement.
Justification for Negative Ratings: Users must provide reasons for "Not Useful" ratings to prevent abuse.
Weighting System for Feedback: Overly extreme ratings (e.g., repeated 1-star spam) are downweighted in the system.
6. API Efficiency & Cost Management (only when required)
To maintain efficiency without excessive OpenAI API costs:
Batch Process Trust Scores (every 5 queries instead of per-response).
Delay Contradiction Checks for free users (only every 10 queries).
Bias & Missing Data Alerts only trigger additional API calls when needed.
7. Final Implementation Plan
✅ Trust Score & Weighting Breakdown visible to all users.
✅ Contradiction & Bias Detection active across all queries.
✅ Feedback System optimized to prevent rating bias & troll abuse.
✅ API calls optimized to reduce unnecessary processing costs.
🚀 This framework transforms Stratogenic AI into an execution-proofed AI decision engine with unparalleled trust and transparency.
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.